Monday, January 30, 2006

Mohammed, child molestor

Muslims believe that Mohammed is "the perfect man." What he did, the Muslim man must do in imitation, ranging from the ritual fingernail clipping to the ritual anus shaving to having four wives at once and an assortment of concubines thrown in for fun. Mohammed, of course, as the prophet actually had more than four wives. He was perfect, afterall, and Allah made exceptions for him. One "wife" Mohammed had was the six year old Aisha. That wasn't exceptional. It's lawful in Islam to this day to molest little girls. Writing this seems extreme and hateful, a slander and a libel against Islam and Muslim people. If only that were true. And if it were we would not continue. The truth is not only out there, it is here. Mohammed, the Perfect Man, is a child molestor. That's why we run thiese graphics. Think about that when you see a woman covered head to toe. What kind of life is she and her daughters condemned to? What about you and your daughters if we do nothing to stop Islam. Islam is not a mater of choice. What choice does a six year old have?

Aisha the Child Wife of Muhammad

Ali Sina

The thought of an old man becoming aroused by a child is one of the most disturbing thoughts that makes us cringe as it reminds us of pedophilia and the most despicable people. It is difficult to accept that the Holy Prophet married Aisha when she was 6-years-old and consummated his marriage with her when she was 9. He was then, 54 years old.

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)'

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88
Narrated 'Ursa:
The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
Please follow the link for more details from the historical Islamic record.


eyesallaround said...

Dag, Great minds think alike. I chose the same picture for my post. It was a toss up between this one and the one where he's beheading the unbelievers... I don't know which is worse, to kill the body, or kill the spirit (as I'm sure was done to this little girl). Bastard. I can remember being 9, and when I looked at anyone over 25, they were OLD. Just the thought of that disgusting pig touching a little girl, let alone raping her... beyond words.

dag said...

I'm an old guy, and even at that I'm younger than Mohammed when he was raping a child of nine. I feel funny dating women in their 30s. Muslims who can say Mohammed was anything other than one genuinely sick piece of work need some correction in the head. Westerners who excuse that kind of thing, who come up with excuses for it, who claim anything at all other than that Mohammed is an evil piece of crap, those people deserve punishment worse than Muslims who are too brainwashed and irrational to know the difference.

But I must reach for my heart pills.

eyesallaround said...

Take it easy there Dag, We don't want to lose a great Crusader!

I totally agree with you, surprise, surpise...


forgetfulmuse said...

That's just sickening. Thank you for telling it like it is.

dag said...

Mohammed is a child molestor, and other evil things too. Historically he was as bad as any figure we could find. Unfortunately, most people have little sense of history, relying, and rightly so, on their peers for social opinions and public intellectuals for our deeper sense of world history and our places in it. Most of us are busy with essential daily routines that require large parts of our days, leaving little time for active study of historical minutea. For the larger intellectual picture that most of us get during our time off we rely on our public intellectuals, on our teachers, our media, our politicians. If they lie to us, if they tell us things unimformed by rigorous study and a commitment to truth, most of us will never know better.

That betrayal of the public trust is evident in the concept of Mohammed being a wise man, a religious figure, a man other than the man he was in fact. But how will the average person know? And finding the contrary version, even one with references to canonical Islamic texts, how does one accept those words from a blogger? It is a matter of credibility.

Mohamed, as one may find in the authoritive Islamic texts, is a child molestor. Our public intellectuals don't bother finding out, and then don't bother checking when they are challenged by the facts. Worse, they rely on Muslims to tell them what they think they should report to us. There is the major problem, a problem one finds only if one takes the time and puts in the effort to study: there is the Qur'anic concept of "taqiyya" in Islam, which is the convenient lie, a lie sanctioned in the Qur'an, the word of Allah himself, that commands the Muslim to lie to the infidel in defense of Islam.

Confronting the Muslim with the facts is of no help. He is required by the tenets of his religion to lie he is by constant drumming, required to submit to the will of Allah, to resist critical inquiry, to be, lliterally, a muslim. one who submits.

We, the public, individual people, must either rely on the intelligenstia for our knowledge of greater public truths or we must find out for ourselves. Obviously there is more than anyone can ever know regardless of the narrowness of ones field of interest.
In stating that Mohammed is a child molestor I do not do so to infuriate Muslims. Not this time. We, when confronted with something as outrageous as that, must find out for ourselves, and then we must trust ourselves in spite of the fact that most people wil not believe us. They too will have to find out for themselves until there is a common acceptance that the truth is in fact true.

My point is to show that we are misinformed by our intelligentsia, if not deliberately lied to by paid lackies and lick-spittles. We are betrayed, not only by those who are paid royal sums to lie to us but mostly by naive and lazy people who will not do their jobs as guardians of our public knowledge.

It's not only important that we know about Mohammed and his followers because we have to protect our children from those who think it normal and even moral to sodomize children; it is essential to know because otherwise we will be blinded to all the evils that go along with that ignorance: we might, for example, agree that a mosque in the neighbourhood is a good, if exotic, thing, not realising that it is also a complete totalitarian organizing institution that is so alien to Human decency that we wouild, were we aware, run shrieking through the neighbourhood in alarm.

When our intelligentsia lie to us, or even if they misinform us unintentionally, we are at risk of agreeing to things and concepts that might in time bring us to severe harm.

It's easier to form an idea than to change our minds once we have an idea already. Because the prevailing idea in the public mind is that Mohammed is a religious figure, a wise man, a spiritual person, most people will recoil in horror to even read that he was in fact a child molestor. Now we have to convince people generally that they are misinformed. It's a tough job. It is also esential to our survival as modern and decent people, regardless of how disgusting it is to read these things.

Mohammed was a child molestor. Those who follow his religious are dangerous to us and to themselves, and they are dangerous to children. We must accept that even if it is repugant and at odds with the prevailing view.

forgetfulmuse said...

Something a lot of people don't seem to get is that it's not a fun thing to have to say and that those of us who will say it would rather be able to say the opposite in good conscience. I'm pretty 'new' to all this but I am not new to proper research and having to decide which sources seem credible and which don't. The "intelligentsia" should be so much more objective than they are - I don't know that it hasn't always been that way to some degree, but the universities at the moment seem so biased to the left I don't know if I'd even want to go to one anymore.

It's disgusting that in a land that prides itself on basic freedoms like freedom of speech, a muslim can preach hatred thinly disguised as religion while you or I can't say "Mohammed was a child rapist" without fear of losing friends or worse, then you get off-the-planet lefties convincing themselves that they are brave for saying rubbish like GWB is "the world's biggest terrorist". Mind boggling.

Anonymous said...

Moses got the 12 Commandments.
Jesus got to give his life for all mankind.
Mohammed got a wet dream from Allah giving him the gree light for his paedophilic fantasy.

Seems reasonable. Check out Bukhari for the quote about the dream.

Oh, if you think sex with a 9 year old is bad, read up on the massacre at Medina. I won't spoil the plot, but if you do a Google with words like Mohammed, Jews, Medina,'ll find a few sites with the details.

The murder was ordained by Allah too...says so in Chapter 33 of the that's ok as well then.

Anonymous said...

Typo, 10 commandments!!

dag said...

Most people, including me, are busy making a living during the day and are busy trying to cope with the left-overs of life in the evening, leaving little time for serious study of anything deeper than the TV news. It doesn't do us justice. We read and hear that Islam is (insert today's cliche) and that those who object to it are islamophobic and or racist. Who'd know otherwise unless they have the time and need to know the truth?

How many people know, for example, that Mohammed is considered by Mulsims to be "the perfect man" whom all observant Muslims must imitate in all minute details rangeing from clipping fingernails in the proper sequence on the right day to shaving around ones anus in a specific ritual motion? Who would care to know that when one has a busy day? Well, we don't care much for it. But the larger aspects of Islam, the violence and the terrorism that Mohmmed praticed and that all Mulsims are require to follow in imitation, those are things we should know, and that we don't know as a rule because our intelligentsia either don't know enough to inform us or from those who do they withold that knowledge from us 'for our own good,' 'for reasons of civility,' 'for the sake of not giving offence to others.'

How many people sit to think that Islma is not a race? Who thinks that Islam is not Arabic ethnicity? that Arabs, whom most conflate with Islam, make up only 20 per ceent of the Mulsim ummah? That Indonesia is the largest Muslim population on Earth? that to be islamophobic is a certain proper approach to Islam when we see it and know it to be an unchanged and viscious tribal code set down in the 7th century and left to stagnate ater the downfall of the Mutazilite reform of the 8th century? We have so little time. We must be able to trust our intelligentsia to give us the facts that we may consider personally to make up our minds rationally. We are badly betrayed.

It is in that spirit that we here are pushing the cartoons of Mohammed, a push we hope will enrage Muslims to the point that they expose themselves immediately and viscerally to us so that we, confronted with their unvarnished behaviour will not be albe to ignore the essense of Islam as it is rather than as we are told it is, as we might wish it were.

The Battle of the Trench is a horror celebrated today by Muslims. Don't hold your breath, atheists and dhimmi idiots, hoping to find Christians celebrating the destruction of Jericho as something we and others should do today. There is no equivalence between Christianity and Islam other than in the small and spiteful minds of Left dhimmi fascists, the trendy unthinking idiots who conform to the cliches of the time. Not being a believer myself I can see it. How is it that the so-called Left connot? They are morbid conformists and poseurs foollowing the fashions of their friends. That is where our intelligentsia fail us: in giving us the party line on Islam according to their friends they lie to us, treat us as if they were Plantonic Philosopher Kings, and we mere Iron people. There is too little time in a day to find out specifiacally for ourselves the truth on all matters of concern; but Islam is a matter we must take the time to expose in any way we can. It is better to read the Qur'an oneself than to rely on others, to read the ahadith, to read the sira,; but there is little time, and one must rely on other factors. Hence we provide the world with cartoons to enrage and engage our Muslim cousins so they will show us by prxis the face of Islam as it is on the ground.

For those who have the time and inclination, by all means look to the canonical texts of Islam. But for the rest, look at what Muslims do. They go crazy because of cartoons. They kill people. They are out of control.

Anonymous said...

I read in newspapers people decribed as racists when they comment or disagree with Islam. I would like to know when did Islam become a race??? Can someone please tell me?? I thought it was a religion or more a cult. I think journalists should check dictionary meaning before writing their articles for print.

dag said...

Yes, this "racism" insult is the product of lazy minds. Islam started with a beduin in the Arabian desert, spread to a teenager, Mohammed's cousin Ali, and then to a gang of guys who didn't fit in with the social structure in Mecca. but today, and from early on, Islam was and is a cult that will accept anyone, regardless of who they are. Having made that point, let us accept that Islam is Arbo-centric. Most if not all men take Arabic names and practice 7th century Arabian tribal customs.

That alone is not to condemn Arabs, 80 per cent of whom in the United States are Christians. And it is not to condemn Indonesians who comprise the single largest Muslim population on earth. Arabs make up only 20 per cent of the Islamic ummah, or collective. To suggest that condemnation of Islam is racist is to commit a stupidity. That must be why our media flock to the cliche. They must hate to break a consistent pattern.

Anonymous said...

Islam is spreading inspite of your hatred!

inspite of your dominant piggish Mass Media

Well thousands of Piggish publications and journals newspapers magazines......
TV shows Radio broadcast; they all chant:

Child molest..
...... piggish caricatures

But even though

Islam is becoming stronger and stronger its even spreading and its followers are awake

God leads people to this correct faith
so this light won't blow out throught your piggish farts!

Give up!

If Moslems piss on you you'll drink beer till you get drunk for ever!

Anonymous said...

You vomit and it your own vomit!


Yes a pig eats its own scum!

who eats it?

Jesus saved Mankind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the aborigines and the red indians
the inkas
the six milliom jews
the jews under inquisition
the vietnames and the cambodians
from what did he save mankind
from your atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki?

from BSE!
from AIDS


Who told you that Shaul"Paulus"?

Anonymous said...

he was still a peado though... you can't excuse that.

Anonymous said...

And if you hate the western world so much, go to an islamic country. Why should the Uk support muslims with free houses and welfare when you preach hatred for the country that supports you and tolerates your hatred.