****
Sayanim – Defenders of Western Civilization
The sayanim, derived, according to Victor Ostrovsky, from the Hebrew word 'to help' are a huge world-wide network of Jews in strategic or useful places (real estate, mass media, finance, car dealerships etc…) who have been agreed to help in Israeli Mossad actitivies within their own countries. This has been ascribed to the supra-national loyalty sayanim offer to Israel, above and not always in the interest of their home country. According to Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon, in their detailed biography, Robert Maxwell, Israel's Superspy (Carroll and Graf Publishers, 2002), the notorious media mogul, Robert Maxwell, was a super-sayanim, providing cover, offices, political connections, money-laundering services and planted stories in the service of Israel at the Mossad's beheast. Jonathan Pollard, the American Naval Researcher jailed for espionage, is another notorious sayanim. The activities of these 'helpers' really range from the spectacular to the more mundane and, according to Victor Ostrovsky, in his 1990 biography By Way of Deception, the sayanim represent a pool of thousands of active and inactive individuals who can provide services discretely out of loyalty to 'the cause of Israel' as defined by any current Mossad operation. The cynicism of this arrangement is clear: It makes little difference to the Mossad if an operation, such as 'Flemming Rose', jeopardizes the national and economic interests of the sayanim's own country and , if exposed, might harm the status of Jews in the diaspora. The standard response from the Mossad would be: "So what's the worst that could happen to those Jews? They'd all come to Israel? Great." This recklessness clearly has ramifications for Jews who have refused to be recruited as Mossad helpers in affected countries.
[....]
The reasons that millions are demonstrating against a caricature of Mohammed published in an insignificant Scandinavian rightwing newspaper is that this is the last straw – the detonator – of a series of deliberate violations of fundamental social and political rights of Muslim, Arab and colonized peoples. While the Western media have focused exclusively on the religious content of the demonstrators, almost every country, where massive sustained demonstrations have taken place, has been subject to recent Western intervention, large-scale pillage of raw materials and/or experienced the destruction of their secular rights: countries invaded, homes, schools, hospital, systems of health and clean water demolished, agriculture and natural resources looted, museums, libraries and archeological sites pillaged and mosques desecrated. The present condition for material existence has been a Western inferno for all the people (both secular and observant) living in Arab or Islamic countries. Now their most profound, historic, spiritual reference point, the prophet Mohammed – the most cherished religious figure – has been repeatedly trampled with impunity by arrogant imperialists, their media servants, aided and abetted by the Israeli state and its overseas 'sayanin' operatives. It is cynical to suggest that practicing Moslems could desecrate the figure of Jesus Christ with impunity when that too is forbidden by the Koran.
[....]
http://peacepalestine.blogspot
james-petras-and-robin-eastman
.
There's more. There's much more. Lunatics can't help themselves from running on without end. And the problem is that many of our so-called Left intellectuals are not significantly better than the mornons responsible for the crap above. We often nod and smile when we hear the crap above voiced in public. We read it in the MSM, though put more or less euphemistically. We get this racist drivel from our universities, and now from the likes of Neil Bush, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton. It's time to stand up in public and let the people around us know that this is too stupid and repulsive to go unchallenged any longer. When we hear this crap from people on the bus or in the market we have not only a right but a duty to tell them to go fuck themselves. We do not have to be polite to creatures like this. They deserve scorn and ridicule and spit. But there are those who will imprison us for "hate-speech" and "religious vilification" if we voice our oppostion to this kind of outrageous mental illness. To that I have this to say:
My name is Dag Walker. You can find me at our weekly meeting at McDonald's in Vancouver, Canada on Thursday evening from 7-9:00 pm at Main st and Terminal ave. I wear a blue scarf. You can't miss me. If you don't like it, arrest me.
Mohammed is a child molestor, a murderer, a criminal psychopath. Palestinians are garbage people who should be imprisoned whole. Those who support them should be hanged from lamp posts. If there's any ambiguity in my positon I am happy to elaborate.
15 comments:
The sayanim, derived, according to Victor Ostrovsky, from the Hebrew word 'to help' are a huge world-wide network of Jews in strategic or useful places (real estate, mass media, finance, car dealerships etc…) who have been agreed to help in Israeli Mossad actitivies within their own countries.
Reminds me a bit of The Protocols of Zion.
I made my way through the whole long piece, and I came away from it pretty disgusted. Yes, it's outright neo-Nazi racism, a paraphraze of the Protocols. How people can condone this kind of evil rubbish is beyond me. But then, there are many things I will never comprehend. Thank God for that.
who ethnically cleansed the Palestinians, if not those who took their land. Don't bother abusing me, just enjoy your world view while it lasts.
http://palrocks.blogspot.com/
five years ago I wouldn't have called myself a supporter of Isreal
But the more I learn about the Blood thirsty Cult of Islam and thier child raping false prophet Muhammad(Pedophile Be Upon Her)
I am behind Isreal whatever thier intentions might be,for the one thing I do know,is thier hatred for the cult of Islam is a GOOD thing.
I can't wait for the (US/Isreal)Iranian strike should be sweet.
What do you do when you have problems with both sides?
God Bless America, God Save The Republic.
David asks what we do when we have problems with both sides, in this case feeling sympathy for the Palestinians who are fighting for a land of their own against a land of people who are both powerful and assaulted on all sides. What do we do?
Setting aside my usual fanaticism momentarily, not taking a partisan postion at all, how do I come to decisions about troubling dilemmas? I do not pray for revelation. I do not rely on the television or the newspaper. Nor do I rely on the public opinion that generates the ideas most citizens have on concerns of public importance. I don't ask my friends. I don't look at what others think and mimic them. I don't cling to the ideas I think are mine and despise and hate those who disagree with me. I'm fortunate in that I can travel where I please and live as I choose for as long as I do. And I do so as one man who cares not a damn for other people's opinions just because they have them.
Unlike religious people or ideologues I don't know the truth. I believe that no one short of God knows the truth, and since I'm an atheist I have no expectation of ever finding it. I'm highly suspicious of those who tell me they know. In fact, I question them until I'm satisfied that I understand what they think they think, and then I dismiss them. Then I go on.
I go on, unlike the religious, unlike the ideologues, certainly unlike the idiots above, with a goal. Amateur that I am, I sit at the agora, at McDonald's, for example, and I go to the acropolis seldom. I have a goal. My goal is to find the Moral.
I question the living and I question the dead. I talk and I read. I listen and I think. I question.
I don't claim to know the truth, but I do claim to know more that the grunters above and the killers they ape and grovel to. And I know the killers because I live with them. I know the just because I live with them too. They tell me how I should know them. I examine them as they are, and then, having thought, I decide.
Unlike the religious and the ideologues, I now that some is better and some is worse; and from that I know that some is good and some is evil.
How do you decide? Start by not deciding. Because really, what do you know?
Hmm, there are lots of truths one can know. Like, it's raining. One just can't know the whole and entire truth and nothing but the truth. IN human affairs, what is true is either 1) what works for people or 2) what is more explanatory than the explanations that came before. For example, Dag's comments are rather more illuminating re the human condition than are x's or cutter's. They promote my human self-understanding. What is the ultimate proof that they are true, relative to what came before? Well, if in the long run more people think like Dag than those other fellows, the truth is proven.
Dag professes he does not know the truth, but in fact I'd bet that the market says he does. Humanity is fundamentally based on relations of exchange and we find our truths therein; the more complex or free the network of exchange, the more truth therein, just as there is more human truth to be found in studying Mcdonald's than vegetarianism, not that I'm knocking the latter for those who like an austere truth.
Truepeers, that is my laugh for the day. Thank very much.
your goal is to find the moral, then why do you insist that Israel is moral? Some arguments please.
As a famous sufi from Mali once said: there are three truths - My truth, your truth and the truth.
Keep working on Moral, you probably won't get there, but you have quite a road to go and the trip might be interesting.
Well, Dag. It looks like I owe you an apology.
Forgive me confusing you with the likes of stogie...not that stogie is not entitled to its opinion.
I do not have an advantage over the truth. Why even saying such a thing sounds foolish.
My concern is the plight of the
palestinians, for now. I do not preach that I know anything about anyone, but I do ask those that have formulated their opinions about palestinians to question their stance, their motives.
Principally, I am against zionism.
I mistook your blog for one of those zionist mouthpieces, run by fools who think they are "helping the cause", and do not realise they are feeding the machine.
But what do I know, right?
All I know is the machine is targetting palestinians, a microcosm for the future of the non-corporate world; if you have any doubts, see the aftermath of Katrina for my more evidence, on North American soil.
My aim, should I have one, is to get people to think for themselves.
Alas, in my experience, people are lazy and peddle anything they see or read, just to be accepted, just to be left alone...
With regards to these toons, they came out last Sept/Oct 2005! My question is why is it a hot issue now, 5 months later? Cartoons by nature are subversive. These cartoons are meaningless without a context. You have to go back to the islamophobic behaviour that's errupted in the developed countries, namley the US and EU, over the last five years, coupled with some elementary knowledge of Islam, to fully comprehend the reactions (on all sides); not I do not condone those reactions, it should have stopped at flag burning and boycotting Danish goods (the rest is just mob frenzy spinning out of control).
Thank you for your time.
Cutter, X, see also this argument
Nony,
I will not engage your pitiful, rude "arguments"; muslims ARE being targetted in the US...
you have heard of guantanamo bay.
There is plenty wrong with any ideology that feels comfortable with ethnic cleansing.
I will leave it at that.
You're not serious truepeers, are you?
What pair of amatuers.
And what, pray tell, is a talented amatuer? More foolishness. Please truepeers, get a grip.
Before I dispense with your irrationale,
I will say this, your word is hardly final.
You make a fatal assumption, little one. For not only do you speak in cliche, your formulation is flawed. I will put it another way, the 3 options you provide, according to your words, define israel.
I think this a rather shallow way to proceed.
I doubt you will find many israelis who would agree with you, let alone the options that you provide.
Honest enough?
Not much cogent in your response, Mr. X. But something needs to be said about this:
"your word is hardly final"
Damn straight. But i wonder, is that what all Mohammedans say to Jews?
Of course the whole point of our faith is that we never pretend to have the final word. Our committment to the truth is premised not on its non-existence, but on the fact that we can never grasp it in its entirety; we must patiently forever await the return of the Messiah who will only come the day after the day he finally comes.
The Mohammedans on the other hand believe they have the final word. And that's why they cause so many problems for the world trying to shove their word down everyone's throats. Unfortunately, they have on average about as much intelligence as Mr. X, and can't get very far by discursive means, and so they turn to the sword. WHen that fails they turn to the suicide bomber. When that fails the nuclear bomb. When that fails the stone axe. Getting us to bomb the whole world back to the stone age is the only hope for regaining your Caliphate, so keep hating Israel: as long as it's around we won't be fighting with stone axes.
The Jews are smart, creative, pushy, precisely because they know they don't have the final word, but never give up looking and waiting for the next non-final word, because they know humanity cannot survive without continually renewing the non-final word. And antisemitism and anti-Zionism boils down to resentment of these pushy creative people who don't accept the word as it is given by CHrist or Mohammed as being divine or final, whatever (non-final) truths they might nonetheless see and even embrace in these other faiths. Get it? Help save the world, convert today!
Post a Comment