Posts
Ken Livingstone
London Mayor attacks pregnant woman with chainsaw
London Mayor Ken Livingstone attacked his pregnant partner with a chainsaw, punched an elderly war veteran down a flight of stairs, fired a semi-automatic rifle at police during a two-hour car chase before barricading himself in a packed childrens' playcentre, dousing himself with petrol and shouting "You'll never take me alive, copper", we can confirm.
Here is another quote from Mayor Lingston's past.
"I actually think that Bush is the greatest threat to life on this planet that we've most probably ever seen. The policies he is initiating will doom us to extinction."
Eyewitnesses, speaking exclusively to The Rockall Times , further state that during the crack-fuelled orgy of destruction and mayhem, Livingstone KICKED a neighbour's cat over a garden wall, URINATED on a portrait of Her Majesty Liz Two while swilling RUSSIAN VODKA supplied by his MOSCOW PAYMASTERS.
On Ariel Sharon:
"I'd like to see him locked up in the next cell to the former Serb President Slobodan Milosevic."
One of our visibly-shocked sources, who asked to be paid but not named, said: "I was shocked, quite frankly. I was ideally placed to see the whole thing — right next to a telephone while reading a copy of The Evening Standard. As I looked out of the window I saw Red Ken burning a Union Jack on the front steps of someone's house. When a passer-by tried to stop him, the Mayor stabbed him seventeen times with a ceremonial dagger. He then stripped himself naked and bathed in the man's warm and still-pumping blood."
On the Saudi Royal Family:
"I just long for the day I wake up and find that the Saudi Royal family are swinging from the lamp-posts and they've got a proper government that represents the people of Saudi Arabia."
Livingstone appeared before a special session of the London Assembly last week where he attempted to save his flayed political skin. He says the entire story is a fabrication. We say: Tell that to the orphaned children, Livingstone.
On Bush:
"I'm not even sure he was aware there were any Palestinians before he was elected, any more than he knew the name of the President of Pakistan."
The question is this: What kind of nadir has our democracy sunk to where men of Livingstone's ilk can gain elected office from which to launch an attack on the very bedrock of our society? God help us all.
On the Middle East:
"[There will be no peace until] the West shows it is taking on board the injustice of what's happening to Palestinians, and looks at the financial network of corruption between some of the oil sheikhdoms , the oil companies and the White House."
And, while police sources assert that they have received no notification of the alleged offences, one thing is clear — Livingstone is the Antichrist made flesh an he must GO, he must GO NOW and he must NOT COME BACK. The people have spoken.
Anybody who enjoys being in the House of Commons probably needs psychiatric help.
Ken Livingstone
***
But, Livingstone apparently is that very odd and increasingly rare creature called a sincere liberal. He really believes all the anti-racist propaganda spewed by the Jewish press, so much so that he slowly put two and two together and realized that Israel was a Jewish supremacist state that is every bit as "racist" as was Nazi Germany and is one of the modern day's most brutal and murderous regimes. Those who lived during the Nazi occupation of France and who have also seen the Zionist occupation of the Palestinian West Bank, will tell you that life is considerably worse in the West Bank. After the occupation of France, the Germans did not routinely shoot French children on the streets and scatter machine gun or rocket fire into neighborhoods full of women and children. This has been almost a daily occurrence in Palestine.
In fact, in the German drives against the Soviets there was no mass efforts of terror and ethnic cleansing to make way for any proposed German Lebensraum. In fact, such ethnic cleansing by terror was and is at the very core of the founding and expansion of the Jewish state. They continuously try to make life so intolerable for the Palestinian people that they embark from their land and flee to other nations where they can find some semblance of normal life.
Livingstone began to see that Zionism and Israel in particular is a virulent racial supremacist state. Its agents are all over the world in media and government. Their task is to keep this fact from the general consensus and to bludgeon down any public official who dares to mention this obvious fact. Livingstone has also committed the unpardonable sin of associating with unapproved Palestinian patriots. Such is unacceptable in the Jewish-dominated press. It is of course, perfectly acceptable for Bush and Blair to kiss and hug with certified war criminals and mass murderers such as Ariel Sharon and the long line of Jewish terrorists that preceded him.
Much of the Jewish press in Britain has been out to get Ken Livingstone for a long-time, for no matter how much he endorsed the destructive Jewish agenda for Britain it was never enough, for one must never speak an iota of evil about the Jewish Apartheid State. It is interesting to note the flimsy grounds they chose to attack him on. Here is a quote from Ms. Phillips on his supposed response to a Jewish reporter that has been dogging and attacking him for years:At a publicly funded party he threw to celebrate the 20th anniversary of Labour MP Chris Smith coming out as gay, Livingstone was door-stepped by Oliver Finegold, a reporter for the London Evening Standard. The mayor responded by asking whether he had previously been a German war criminal. When Finegold protested that he was Jewish, Livingstone observed: "Arrr, right, well you might be Jewish but actually you are just like a concentration camp guard, you are just doing it because you are paid to, aren't you?"
…Likening Finegold to a concentration camp guard when Livingstone knew he was a Jew was unforgivable. Not only was it deeply offensive, but in calling a Jew a Nazi it trivialized the Holocaust and denied the history of Jewish suffering. And this from a mayor whose professed "anti-racism" defines his politics.
Can you read this clap-track with without laughing? Likening an obnoxious reporter to a concentration camp guard may well cost London the 2012 Olympics? Who the hell cares about the private comment of a mayor to an obnoxious reporter? Well who other than, of course, the Jews who may sit on that Olympic committee or the Jews who want to threaten London with economic blackmail if they don't set down Livingstone.
Ladies and gentlemen. The Ken Livingstone case is one more example of the incredibly powerful and at the same time insane power that rules over us. This whole affair should be laughable. But the Jewish supremacists are not laughing. Neither is Mr. Livingstone. And neither should we.
The one redeeming factor of the whole affair is that the tyrannical attempt to squash this one man cannot help but wake up many Britons and other Europeans of the chutzpah of Jewish power!
Such is the perverted world of Jewish supremacism. But, as time goes on more and more people see the perversion, the hypocrisy, the evil of the world's most extreme racial supremacism. Every passing day brings Europeans and the other peoples of the world closer to liberation. Truth is spreading almost at the speed of light. Take this article and with the Internet before you do your part to spread the truth! You can right now mail this article to your whole email address list or go to the internet and post this article on internet forums or go to contact emails and send it to those opinion leaders who solicit your thoughts. Take this opportunity to do your part to enlighten others. The time is now. and ….
Thanks for your Time!
David Duke
***
"If a young Jewish boy in this country goes and joins the Israeli army, and ends up killing many Palestinians in operations and can come back, that is wholly legitimate. But for a young Muslim boy in this country, who might think: I want to defend my Palestinian brothers and sisters and gets involved, he is branded as a terrorist. And I think it is this that has infected the attitude about how we deal with these problems."
"I think it is the Israelis who are leading the stubborn line.The Likud and Hamas members are two sides of the same coin. They need each other in order to attract support.
"Under foreign occupation and denied the right to vote, denied the right to run your own affairs, often denied the right to work for three generations, I suspect that if it had happened here in England, we would have produced a lot of suicide bombers ourselves.
"The Palestinians don't have jet planes, don't have tanks, they only have their bodies to use as weapons."
David Duke.
No, Ken Livingsone.
No, parody of Ken Livingstone.
No, Ken Livingstone.
4 comments:
I've seen on other weblogs Livingstone described as "Lord Haw Haw without the dignity." Treason, I say, and since England doesn't have the death penalty, life imprisonment is his just dessert
Thanks for writing. Much appreciated.
David Duke is a malignant narcissist.
He invents and then projects a false, fictitious, self for the world to fear, or to admire. He maintains a tenuous grasp on reality to start with and the trappings of power further exacerbate this. Real life authority and David Duke’s predilection to surround him with obsequious sycophants support David Duke’s grandiose self-delusions and fantasies of omnipotence and omniscience.
David Duke's personality is so precariously balanced that he cannot tolerate even a hint of criticism and disagreement. Most narcissists are paranoid and suffer from ideas of reference (the delusion that they are being mocked or discussed when they are not). Thus, narcissists often regard themselves as "victims of persecution".
Duke fosters and encourages a personality cult with all the hallmarks of an institutional religion: priesthood, rites, rituals, temples, worship, catechism, and mythology. The leader is this religion's ascetic saint. He monastically denies himself earthly pleasures (or so he claims) in order to be able to dedicate himself fully to his calling.
Duke is a monstrously inverted Jesus, sacrificing his life and denying himself so that his people - or humanity at large - should benefit. By surpassing and suppressing his humanity, Duke became a distorted version of Nietzsche's "superman". But being a-human or super-human also means being a-sexual and a-moral.
In this restricted sense, narcissistic leaders are post-modernist and moral relativists. They project to the masses an androgynous figure and enhance it by engendering the adoration of nudity and all things "natural" - or by strongly repressing these feelings. But what they refer to, as "nature" is not natural at all.
Duke invariably proffers an aesthetic of decadence and evil carefully orchestrated and artificial - though it is not perceived this way by him or by his followers. Narcissistic leadership is about reproduced copies, not about originals. It is about the manipulation of symbols - not about veritable atavism or true conservatism.
In short: narcissistic leadership is about theatre, not about life. To enjoy the spectacle (and be subsumed by it), the leader demands the suspension of judgment, depersonalization, and de-realization. Catharsis is tantamount, in this narcissistic dramaturgy, to self-annulment.
Narcissism is nihilistic not only operationally, or ideologically. Its very language and narratives are nihilistic. Narcissism is conspicuous nihilism - and the cult's leader serves as a role model, annihilating the Man, only to re-appear as a pre-ordained and irresistible force of nature.
Narcissistic leadership often poses as a rebellion against the "old ways" - against the hegemonic culture, the upper classes, the established religions, the superpowers, the corrupt order. Narcissistic movements are puerile, a reaction to narcissistic injuries inflicted upon David Duke like (and rather psychopathic) toddler nation-state, or group, or upon the leader.
Minorities or "others" - often arbitrarily selected - constitute a perfect, easily identifiable, embodiment of all that is "wrong". They are accused of being old, they are eerily disembodied, they are cosmopolitan, they are part of the establishment, they are "decadent", they are hated on religious and socio-economic grounds, or because of their race, sexual orientation, origin ... They are different, they are narcissistic (feel and act as morally superior), they are everywhere, they are defenseless, they are credulous, they are adaptable (and thus can be co-opted to collaborate in their own destruction). They are the perfect hate figure. Narcissists thrive on hatred and pathological envy.
This is precisely the source of the fascination with Hitler, diagnosed by Erich Fromm - together with Stalin - as a malignant narcissist. He was an inverted human. His unconscious was his conscious. He acted out our most repressed drives, fantasies, and wishes. He provides us with a glimpse of the horrors that lie beneath the veneer, the barbarians at our personal gates, and what it was like before we invented civilization. Hitler forced us all through a time warp and many did not emerge. He was not the devil. He was one of us. He was what Arendt aptly called the banality of evil. Just an ordinary, mentally disturbed, failure, a member of a mentally disturbed and failing nation, who lived through disturbed and failing times. He was the perfect mirror, a channel, a voice, and the very depth of our souls.
Duke prefers the sparkle and glamour of well-orchestrated illusions to the tedium and method of real accomplishments. His reign is all smoke and mirrors, devoid of substances, consisting of mere appearances and mass delusions. In the aftermath of his regime - Duke having died, been deposed, or voted out of office - it all unravels. The tireless and constant prestidigitation ceases and the entire edifice crumbles. What looked like an economic miracle turns out to have been a fraud-laced bubble. Loosely held empires disintegrate. Laboriously assembled business conglomerates go to pieces. "Earth shattering" and "revolutionary" scientific discoveries and theories are discredited. Social experiments end in mayhem.
It is important to understand that the use of violence must be ego-syntonic. It must accord with the self-image of David Duke. It must abet and sustain his grandiose fantasies and feed his sense of entitlement. It must conform David Duke like narrative. Thus, David Duke who regards himself as the benefactor of the poor, a member of the common folk, the representative of the disenfranchised, the champion of the dispossessed against the corrupt elite - is highly unlikely to use violence at first. The pacific mask crumbles when David Duke has become convinced that the very people he purported to speak for, his constituency, his grassroots fans, and the prime sources of his narcissistic supply - have turned against him. At first, in a desperate effort to maintain the fiction underlying his chaotic personality, David Duke strives to explain away the sudden reversal of sentiment. "The people are being duped by (the media, big industry, the military, the elite, etc.)", "they don't really know what they are doing", "following a rude awakening, they will revert to form", etc. When these flimsy attempts to patch a tattered personal mythology fail, David Duke becomes injured. Narcissistic injury inevitably leads to narcissistic rage and to a terrifying display of unbridled aggression. The pent-up frustration and hurt translate into devaluation. That which was previously idealized - is now discarded with contempt and hatred. This primitive defense mechanism is called "splitting". To David Duke, things and people are either entirely bad (evil) or entirely good. He projects onto others his own shortcomings and negative emotions, thus becoming a totally good object. Duke is likely to justify the butchering of his own people by claiming that they intended to kill him, undo the revolution, devastate the economy, or the country, etc. The "small people", the "rank and file", and the "loyal soldiers" of David Duke - his flock, his nation, and his employees - they pay the price. The disillusionment and disenchantment are agonizing. The process of reconstruction, of rising from the ashes, of overcoming the trauma of having been deceived, exploited and manipulated - is drawn-out. It is difficult to trust again, to have faith, to love, to be led, to collaborate. Feelings of shame and guilt engulf the erstwhile followers of David Duke. This is his sole legacy: a massive post-traumatic stress disorder.
Anon, your comments above show a fine sophisticatioin far exceeding anything I wrote above, which leads me to believe you've found other writing here to justfy your time and energy in writing such a post. I am highly impressed by your comments and your obvious intelligence and erudition. I welcome you to continue commenting. I encourage you to whatever extent I can in this medium.
I'll leave your post here for the day and return to it next evening at this late hour to post it whole at our more upscale blog at
http://covenantzone.blogspot.com/
Please check the main page here as well becuause I am very excited by your comments and might well publish it there too. If so I'll also put up a lead-in at IBA, which I'll note in the intro. to this post.
Please stay in touch regardless.
Regards, Dag.
Post a Comment