Sunday, April 09, 2006

Lego my Thigho

This landed in the letter box. I like it very much:

We shall destroy Europe, country by country. We shall start by destroying the economy of Denmark and negating its corrupting influence on Muslim children's minds by boycotting LEGO. The following fatwa has been issued..


Dear Brothers and Sisters in Islam,
Introducing THIGHO, a halal replacement for LEGO.
It is the duty of every Muslim parent to prevent their children playing with the accursed Danish LEGO blocks (may Allah sends his gremjinns into their factory so that they may be produced misshapen and fail to fit together.)

Khomeini Childcare Enterprises has therefore launched a new amusing pastime for Dads and kids to be marketed as THIGHO ( known as Mufa’khathat in Arabic - but our marketing department said this wasn't catchy enough for the English-speaking market).

For reviews of THIGHO see

Be assured to know that our beloved Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) played THIGHO with Ayesha when she was aged between 6 to 9. But beware, if you let your children play with the damnable Kaffir LEGO, they could produce abominations like this...

Mufa’khathat makes for happy Muslim families

- Allahu Akhbar
Ayatollah Khomeini
CEO Khomeini Childcare


Anonymous said...

Funny stuff...making lego into willy wonkas.

by the way, theres another great site on islam here.

American Crusader said...

Ayatollah Khomeini had some pretty outrageous thoughts on sex with children and animals. I guess if it was good enough for Mohammed

Canadian Sentinel said...

Nothing funny whatsoever about what I found at the links, particularly the one.

Muslim Nazis!

I just did a post based on what I found.

Always On Watch said...

"Ayatollah" has been frequenting my site today. He left the same links and some additional satire as well.

Anonymous said...

muslims are NAZIS!!!!

They long to kill jews just as the nazis did. They read Mein kampf. Wake up! the nazis are here again in bigger numbers.

dag said...

It might seem pedantic on my part but I do claim that Muslims are fascists rather than specifically Nazis. And it is pedantic beyond question to refuse the definition of fascist as broader than Musssolini's specific Italian movement of the 1920-40s.Those inclined to pedantry are better off not coming here.

Mussolini was not a Nazi, but Hitler was a fascist. We can in the same way claim that Watt Tyler was a communist but he was not a Marxist. We have had one commentator here who relies specifically on a dictionary to define "fascism." He didn't actually use a good dictionary to find out the eytmology of the term. Nor does he understand the nature of dictionaries themselves. We gain an advantage if we see the broader sense of the history of ideas, and especially here if we understand Plato to be the intellectual father of fascism as a general concept rather than as a narrow political movement from Italy in the early 20th century. Once we grasp the unity of fascism through histroy, then we can begin to understand the development of fascism to this day culminating today in Islam and Left dhimmitude. This blog does allow for that. There are roughly 600 posts here, roughly 500 of which are directly related to the nature of the history of fascism from Plato to today. It's harder to get through those posts than a dictionary insert. I like to think the effort it takes to make ones way through the blog as a whole is worth the effort for those who would understand the nature of our times in relation to Islam and Left dhimmi fascism. I tend to dismiss the lazy and the stupid.

But, are Muslims Nazis? Some are, and specifically Nazi in the neo-Nazi sense, as one will see from the recent entry on the Turkish Grey Wolves, as one can see from the pieces on Haj Amin and the Handschar Division. There is also a great deal of work to be found on Afleck's founding of Ba'ath, (Renaissance,) and Ataturk's Young Turks movement.

I tend to distinguish between the Nazi-affiliated Haj Amin and the later version of the neo- Nazi-allied Muslim Brotherhood, the PLO and HAMAS.

In practical terms this is only important in that we might find allies in the Right fascist camp who are anti-Muslim while still being fascists. In that sense it is a marriage of convenience. If European fascists are willing to wage counter-jihad against Islam in Europe, then that is to the good; but if they do so as a majority reactionary movement, then it is to the bad. If the Iron Guard beat the Arrow Cross, then it is good unless the Iron Guard win the over-all struggle. It is there that we must be certain of our own position so as not to be misled in our alliances. We might be in favor of some of what some do while not being in favor of what they promote otherwise. We must know what we agree to and why. It's my hope that this blog will help clarify that issue for those with the patience to read through it.