Anna Mulrine, "One less skill for soldiers to master at boot camp: bayonet training," Christian Science Monitor. 28 September 2010.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2010/0928/One-less-skill-for-soldiers-to-master-at-boot-camp-bayonet-trainingIn 2004, with ammunition running low, a British unit launched a bayonet charge toward a trench outside of Basra, Iraq, where some 100 members of the Mahdi Army militia were staging an attack. The British soldiers later said that though some of the insurgents were wounded in the bayonet charge itself, others were simply terrified into surrender.
Instilling such terror is at the heart of the philosophical argument for keeping bayonet training, historians say.
“Traditionally in the 20th century – certainly after World War I – bayonet training was basically designed to develop in soldiers aggressiveness, courage, and preparation for close combat,” says Richard Kohn, professor of military history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Bayonet training is, in short, used to undo socialization – to “basically to try to mitigate or eradicate the reluctance of human beings to kill each other,” Mr. Kohn says. It is one of the challenges in US or Western society “where we have such reverence for the individual, where we socialize our people to believe in the rule of law, and all of that,” he adds. “What you’re doing with young people is trying to get them used to the highly emotional and irrational and adrenaline-filled situations in which they are liable to find themselves whether they are within sight of the enemy or not – and the reluctance to take a life.”
I am deeply concerned not only over Molly Norris being abandoned by our nation, I am sickened that all women in our nation are at risk because it seems all the men are creepy and cowardly. If men won't defend women, what the fuck good are they? Yes, what good are the women? What is any good at all if we just don't care about women and children?
Television pundit Virginia Ironside prompted outrage yesterday after saying she would suffocate a child to end its suffering.
Shocked BBC viewers complained after the agony aunt said she would hold a pillow over the face of a child in pain.
Minutes earlier the controversial writer said 'a loving mother' would abort an unwanted or disabled baby, and praised abortion as 'a moral and unselfish act'.
2 comments:
Your point regarding the savagery of the bayonet vs the pillow is well taken.
The bayonet is for the messy business of killing someone that is trying to kill you. After all is it said that the order to, "FIX BAYONETS!" is more about mindset than anything else.
Pillows are for killing those that are too weak to fight back.
BTW I am reminded of this classic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNhYJgDdCu4
One of the few things I remember my Grandfather (who fought in World War I) showing me while he was alive, was the bayonet drill.
That video clip is just right! I do laugh.
I laugh at a man injured and in pain partly because he deserved a "lesson," which in this case is a bit harsh; but mostly I laugh because it is the lot of men to suffer. I think of suffering as a prize we gain in the struggle to make good the lives of women and children. Pain and death are the rewards of men who fight for others, and I think it's good. I can respect a man I fight if he fights a good fight. I have nothing but hatred for someone who'd kill a baby or a helpless adult with a pillow. Why not, if it were a matter of mercy, use a bayonet, which is quicker anyway? Obviously because they want to sanitize murder, making it bloodless and quiet and invisible. It would be far better for the killed to go by bayonet. No, it's not about the "victim." It's about the convenience of the killer. Damn them anyway.
Glad you brought that up. I liked the movie, even though the fool of a director claims he made it as an "anti-fascist" movie. What a world.
Post a Comment