Wednesday, June 14, 2006

The Recline of the West.

Our commentator Religion of Pieces provides this item on the nature of jihad in the West. Whether it's pre-planned as claimed by the author below the case is that what we read is a seemingly accurate picture of the way things actually are today in reality.

Personally, I don't credit the majority of Muslims with the skills to pull off a plan greater than the average mini-mart robbery. However, they are succeeding in dawa and jihad by demographics that is sinking our Modernity. Below we might see what they do by design or default, and all of it with the active encouragement of our own, those I refer to as the Left dhimmi fascists of our intelligenstia:



Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America

by Dr. Anis Shorrosh


http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/rob_nothink.htm

Dr. Anis Shorrosh, D.Min, D.Phil, and a member of Oxford Society of Scholars, has traveled in 76 countries. He is a Palestinian Arab Christian American, who is an author, lecturer and producer of TV documentaries. He is author of the best-seller "Islam Revealed" and his tenth book - "Islam: A Threat or a Challenge." - was published in the spring, 2003. You can contact him at PO Box 949, Fairhope, AL 36533, FAX 1-251-621-0507 or phone 1-251-680-7770 or on the net at

http://www.focusing-on-islam.com/.
****

What is to be done?

5 comments:

Dag said...

"What is to be done?" is a title from a book by V.I. Lenin in which he outlines the plan he has to form Communist parties across the world for the express purpose of ruling the world.

I use his title as reference so people will be aware that we must do as he did, and that is to rule the world. That by following the paths of the masters, regardless of their goals, we must act professionally to meet our goals.

It's no mistake that Georges Sorel lauds both Lenin and Mussolini, both being fascist dictators. I use both as models of successful revolutionaries whom we, if we are to succeed should emulate in details if not in theories. It is for that reason I make reference to Sherman and Franco as military leaders, neither man whom I admire. I write also of William Walker and Jean Paul Marat. The rouges gallery above would put me and others in bad company in Hell were we to be like them in any way other than in practical designs for political victory. They are first class bad guts.

It is for that reason that I do not model my life on them but that I do find attractive their results as politicians and revolutionary leaders.

Notice, if you will, that I praise to the skies Jabotinski but not Trotsky; that I appreciate the work of the East India Company but not that of Che Guevara and comany. Were we to fail because we shun the models of bad guys we would not rise to the postion of leading like Jefferson and Franklin. Therefore, I admire the efforts of Henry VIII and Cromwell. I have nothing but hatred for Hitler and Stalin. We have to be rational and intelligent in our choice of models, and we cannot be sentimental in our choices if we are to win our goals.

I won't quote the Jesuit motto, most knowing in advance that it's a failure. I will suggest that school teachers with guns practicing elenchus and aporia is our solution to this vexing problem of the bifurcation of Humanity that will, if we fail, result in either the death of Modernity and the death of a billion Mulsims or that will result in the triumph of Modernity and the death of a billion Mulsims. We need a new path that will take us to a new vision of Humanity without allowing sentiment to guide us wrongly into decay or genocide.

We must act rationally and intelligently and professionally to save ourselves and those who can be saved. It takes professionals and dedicated ones at that. You must be the one, dear reader, who makes history. If not you, then you will be history.

Dag said...

We worry a lot about the demographic make-up of our resistence to Islam. Many of us are older people, in chronological ways, than those we could wish for. Our concerns aren't actually so much for our own lives, though of course we do care about that, but we are generally and deeply concerned about the lives of our children and grandchildren; and we can see a bleakness that will envelope them if they survive at all the current problem of social decay and dhimmitude. Older people think about the future in a way different from younger ones in that we will leave it to them, and we must leave something better than what we had. and there's the problem.

The generation after WWII look at our parents as those who fought the Nazis and the fascists in Japan. The 20th century was a vivid horror we would never repeat, and we would do most anything to save our children from it. But, in our fear of repeating the horrors of the 20th century we lapse into idiocy by becoming pacifists and socialists who live in a daydream world that doesn't allow for the world as it is, the one that is still rooted in the problems of sorting itself out as a Human process. What we older people can pass on to our next generations is only the chance to build slowly on the good we might have left. It's still a struggle, and young people will have to fight and suffer and kill and die for it the same as anyone else. We don't want that to happen, and too many of our own refuse to face the truth that it must. In our desire to protect our young from horror we might well bring upon them all the worse for our care. Our acts of love are in effect perverted and dangerous to the young. Our sentimentality and over-protection of our young are leading our own into death and destruction, exactly what we do not want.

And there's more: we are also leading the entire world of primitive people to extinction by our sentimentality. From our right disgust with the wars of our past century we flee into day dreams of peace and love that have no basis in reality, and we therefore make mad the world's people by inflaming them with man-made rages against us. We protect our own, and we protect them to the point that protection from reality is leading the entire world into a twilight zone of murder beyond anything we witnessed last century. We encourage insantiy rather than Human decency by doing nothing to bound the Human madness that we so much fear and hate.

Our prime example of making a people mad to the point of psychosis is the Palestinians, a whole group of people turned into unsupervised mental patients who murder their own children for the sake of acting out a phantasy, and one that is made in America.

Ours of the 1960s are criminals in this p.c. passion play. I call for Presbyterians to be hanged for war crimes because of what they do to others. We have been "nice" to the point of unleashing the deepest insanities of Human possiblities, and we then further indulge our sentimentalities by going further into them. If we do not stop our self-indulgent ssentimentality, and if our own young do not accept the responsibilities we have shunned, then our young willl suffer for a thousand years, and so will the world, far worse than anything of our last century.

In one of the more interesting accidents of history, Henry VIII took a run at the established Church and created the Anglican Church in its place. His was an act of what Erich Fromm would term "national individuation." His was a stumble and a lurch toward Human individualty. After him came Cromwell who created the citizens' army, which we in the West now benefit from. When another man will willingly defend your freedom, he is about as free as any man I can imagine. Henry and Cromwell cleared the way for Locke and Jefferson who cleared a way for you to continue to clear a path for your children. Mine, damn them anyway, our fellows of the 1960s, seem to be turn us back as fast as they can to the feudal times of man as farm animal. We have to stop this flight from freedom and take what steps we can to further Human freedom, even if Human freedom is painful.

My career as teacher is as dismal as that of author. No one loves me. Thanks for the encouragements.

Dag said...

Brandon, it's a pleasure to see you here taking an interest in the future and in your life as a public intellectual. It's a tough row to hoe but I feel confident in your abilities as I see them.

If I may be so bold, I'd suggest you look into our Blue Revolution to see if you and your mates might like to join us as activists in the revolution of our time. I'll leave it to you to decide how you would approach all those things.

Regards, Dag.

Dag said...

We'll fill you in. Do a google search of Blue Revolution to start and see if you think it's worth pursuing.

Dag said...

I'll do something specific soon on the Blue Revolution. Stay tuned.